Purrify, the founder's own company ·
A backlog of bank and card lines, filed through the review screens
A written report on working through a backlog of unfiled bank and card lines, using the review and journal screens of the app Purrify runs on. The report calls that app the hub.
Done through the hub's own review and journal screens, run locally. Stripe was only read. Nothing sent or spent.
No line had been filed since about 2026-08-22; 174 lines were waiting, the oldest from 2026-08-04.
157 lines, about [AMOUNT] net out: 130 on the hub's own suggestions (the 10 "maybe duplicate" lines checked: all separate charges), 27 by the standing rules [...]
28 lines remain in the review queue.
What the record shows
- On October 19, 2026, a backlog of 174 bank and card lines was worked through the app's own review and journal screens.
- 157 lines were filed. 130 followed the app's own suggestions and 27 followed saved rules. 28 lines stayed in the review queue.
- Stripe was read and not written.
What this does not claim
- That the books keep themselves. The report says no line had been filed since about August 22, so a person had to start the work.
- Who did the work or how long it took.
- Any benefit. It shows no time saved and no money recovered.
- Use on a live site. The report says the work ran locally.
- A clean set of feeds. Two of the three bank connections in the report were out of date or dead.
- Anything beyond that day. It is the author's own written account, with no screenshot or log.
ROIGPT